Work climate and economic performance in sustainable companies
Type of paper: Research Article
Authors
Anastasia-Cristiana Dumitru
Corresponding AuthorAffiliation: Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania
Ionel Bran
Affiliation: Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania
Email: branionel18@stud.ase.ro
How to Cite
Dumitru, A.-C. & Bran, I. (2024). Work climate and economic performance in sustainable companies. CACTUS Tourism Journal, 30 (1). doi.org/10.24818/CTS/6/2024/2.05
© 2024 The Author(s);
Licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0
Abstract
This research aimed to investigate the relationship between work climate, sustainability practices and perceived economic performance in sustainable companies, focusing on the impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) initiatives. The main objective is to assess how workplace climate influence economic performance and how sustainability practices contribute to employee satisfaction. The study uses a quantitative methodology based on a questionnaire consisting of 15 questions distributed to employees of sustainable companies. The collected data were statistically analysed using SPSS software, with correlation and linear regression tests to validate the hypotheses. Three main hypotheses were tested in the study: (H1) the positive relationship between a favourable work climate and economic performance, (H2) the contribution of sustainability practices to improving work climate, and (H3) the correlation between involvement in ESG initiatives and employee satisfaction. The results indicate a significant correlation between a positive work climate and perceived economic performance as well as a correlation between the implementation of ESG initiatives and employee satisfaction. This research contributes to the understanding of how sustainability practises can influence both employee satisfaction and overall business performance and provides guidance for improving organisational strategies in sustainable companies.
Keywords
JEL Classification
References
Acquah, A., Nsiah, T. K., Antie, E. A., & Otoo, B. (2021). Literature review on theories motivation. EPRA International Journal of Economic and Business Review, 9(5), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra6848
Andersson, J. (2024). Theory of change for sustainable business. In A. Koleros, M.-H. Adrien, & T. Tyrrell (Eds.), Theories of change in reality: Strengths, limitations and future directions (pp. 62–67). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032669618-9
Bocken, N. M. (2023). Business models for sustainability. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.842
Chiriţă, R. A., Ungureanu, C. E., & Sbîrcea, I. A. (2024). Perspective on the motivational theories in organizations. Bulletin of the Polytechnic Institute of Iași, Machine Constructions Section, 69(3), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.2478/bipcm-2023-0023
Covaș, L. (2019). Modifying the organisational culture in order to increase the company’s level of sustainability. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 13(1), 254–267. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2019-0023
Gorski, A.-T., & Dumitraşcu, D. D. (2023). Stakeholder ecosystems and corporate sustainability: A nexus for value creation in the age of sustainability. Studies in Business and Economics, 18(2), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2023-0030
Gutterman, A. S. (2022). Corporate sustainability. Sustainable Impact Entrepreneurship Project. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363811210_Corporate_Sustainability
Harrach, C., Geiger, S., & Schrader, U. (2020). Sustainability empowerment in the workplace: Determinants and effects. Sustainability Management Forum, 28(3–4), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-020-00505-1
Iazzolino, G., Bruni, M. E., Veltri, S., Morea, D., & Baldissarro, G. (2023). The impact of ESG factors on financial efficiency: An empirical analysis for the selection of sustainable firm portfolios. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(4), 1917–1927. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2463
Kero, C. A., & Bogale, A. T. (2023). A systematic review of resource-based view and dynamic capabilities of firms and future research avenues. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 18(10), 3137–3154. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.181016
Kiesnere, A. L., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2019). Sustainability management in practice: Organizational change for sustainability in smaller large-sized companies in Austria. Sustainability, 11(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030572
Linnenluecke, M. K. (2022). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance in the context of multinational business research. Multinational Business Review, 30(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-11-2021-0148
Lubis, N. (2022). Resource based view (RBV) in improving company strategic capacity. Research Horizon, 2(6), 587–596. https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.2.6.2022.587-596
Manuti, A., & Giancaspro, M. L. (2019). People make the difference: An explorative study on the relationship between organizational practices, employees’ resources, and organizational behavior enhancing the psychology of sustainability and sustainable development. Sustainability, 11(5), 1499. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051499
Mendes, T., Pereira, L. F., Gonçalves, R. A., Dias, Á. L., & Lopes da Costa, R. (2021). Sustainable practices impacting employee engagement and well-being. Progress in Industrial Ecology – An International Journal, 15(2/3/4), 239–267. https://doi.org/10.1504/PIE.2022.125618
Permatasari, J., & Ratnawati, I. (2021). Work climate and employee performances: A literature [review]. International Research Journal of Management, IT & Social Sciences, 8(2), 184–191. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v8n2.1425
Pham, C. D., Do, T. N., Doan, T. N., Xuân, H. N., & Pham, T. K. (2020). The impact of sustainability practices on financial performance: Empirical evidence from Sweden. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1912526
Pradhan, R. K., Jena, L. K., & Panigrahy, N. P. (2020). Do sustainability practices buffer the impact of self-efficacy on organisational citizenship behaviour? Conceptual and statistical considerations. Journal of Indian Business Research, 12(4), 509–528. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-05-2019-0170
Radzi, S. H., Hamid, N. A., & Ismail, R. F. (2023). An overview of environmental, social and governance (ESG) and company performance. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 131, 1111–1122. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2023.11.90
Rahman, M., Wahab, S. A., & Latiff, A. S. (2022). Definitions and concepts of organizational sustainability: A literature analysis. Society & Sustainability, 4(2), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.38157/ss.v4i2.496
Rahman, M., Wahab, S. A., & Latiff, A. S. (2023). The underlying theories of organizational sustainability: The motivation perspective. Journal of Business and Management Studies, 5(1), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.32996/jbms.2023.5.1.18
Rehman, R. U., Zain ul Abidin, M., Ali, R., Nor, S. M., Naseem, M. A., Hasan, M., & Ahmad, M. I. (2021). The integration of conventional equity indices with environmental, social, and governance indices: Evidence from emerging economies. Sustainability, 13(2), 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020676
Sady, M. (2023). The role of stakeholders in sustainable development. In U. Jagielloński (Ed.), Organizing sustainable development (pp. 203–215). Routledge.
Samaibekova, Z., Choyubekova, G., Isabaeva, K., & Samaibekova, A. (2021). Corporate sustainability and social responsibility. E3S Web of Conferences, 250, 06003. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125006003
Schaltegger, S., Hörisch, J., & Freeman, R. (2019). Business cases for sustainability: A stakeholder theory perspective. Organization & Environment, 32(3), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026617722882
Spiliakos, A. (2018). What is sustainability in business? Harvard Business School Online Blog. https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/what-is-sustainability-in-business
Valentinov, V. (2023). Sustainability and stakeholder theory: A processual perspective. Kybernetes, 52(13), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-05-2023-0819
Zhang, T., Zhang, J., & Tu, S. (2024). An empirical study on corporate ESG behavior and employee satisfaction: A moderating mediation model. Behavioral Sciences, 14(4), 274. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14040274
Zhivkova, S. (2022). Sustainability in the companies practices. European Journal of Marketing and Economics, 8(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.26417/169cbl93