Peer Reviewed

High School Education in Economics – The Importance of Practice

Type of paper: Research Article

Authors

Lidia Alexandra Păun Năstase

Corresponding Author

Affiliation: Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania

Email: nastaselidia@gmail.com

Adelina Maria Cristea

Affiliation: Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania

Email: adelinamcristea@email.com

Florența Larisa Vasile (Ile)

Affiliation: Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania

Email: larisa.ile@gmail.com

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9735-0282

Published:June 15, 2018

How to Cite

Păun Năstase, L. A., Cristea, A. M., & Vasile (Ile), F. L. (2018). High School Education in Economics – The Importance of Practice. CACTUS Tourism Journal, 17 (1).

Based on the official APA guide. Review the full set of examples.

© 2018 The Author(s);

Licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The high school economic education in Romania has the main purpose to cover the scientific knowledge but also to develop the practical skills of young students. The requirement of applied economics courses in colleges has elevated because of the deficiency of practical abilities of graduates and consequently, because of the difficulty of their integration on the labour market. The Romanian school of economics is focused on diverse economic qualifications and comprises applied classes developed in partnership with local companies. Our research paper objectives are related to expose the students’ awareness about the importance of the applied trainings developed by partners firms and about their perception of the effect of the economic high school education upon their career. This pilot research may be a typical periodic survey for every single high school with economic profile and furthermore, could be a support for an analysis of the technological educational system in correlation with market changing requirements. The results of this survey demonstrate the reality of the actual education system in the economical field related to the high school level and could be extended to other surveys in different sphere of education.

Keywords

Economic, education, high school, applied, students

JEL Classification

A210, I210

References

Apostu, O. (2015). The analysis of the pre-university education system in Romania from the perspective of some statistical indicators. University Publishing House.

Butnaru, S., & Gerasim, R. L. (2013). School performance. Polirom.

Cucoș, C. (2013). Education: Experiences, reflections, solutions. Polirom.

Cucoș, C. (2017). Education: Foundations, dynamics, prefigurations. Polirom.

Diaconu, M., & Stăiculescu, C. (2012). Psychopedagogy of adolescents, youth and adults. ASE Publishing House.

Hatos, A. (2006). Sociology of education. Polirom.

Ignat, I., & Luțac, Gh. (1996). Requirements of the modernization of the Romanian economic education. In Restructuring of economic theory. Economics Publishing House.

Lăcătuș, M. L. (2009). Pre-university education and economic education. ASE Publishing House.

Stăiculescu, C. (2012). School and local community: Partnership for education. ASE Publishing House.

Stăncescu, I. (2017). Metacognition and motivation in academic learning: Psychodidactic references. University Publishing House.

Stoian, A. C. (2016). The impact of complementary evaluation methods on school elementary performance in pre-university education. University Publishing House.