Patterns in Undergraduate Theses Supervision in Business and Economics

Looking at three-year long BA (Hons) courses from the Bucharest University of Economic Studies, thesis writing and supervision play a crucial part for both students and lecturers, especially in the second semester of the third year of the course. Through the guidance provided, effective communication and constructive feedback, tutors have the ability to influence students’ perception of their learning process and contribute to their personal development, as well as build their self-confidence. The aim of this scientific paper is to present the advantages and disadvantages of thesis supervision, through discussion of published literature, as well as primary research result analysis. The literature review discusses the ever-changing roles of lecturers and students in the thesis supervision process, the similarities between thesis supervision and distance learning, as well as the advantages of individual meetings and group tutorials. The study uses a mixed research methodology: qualitative - a focus group with lectures from the Bucharest University of Economic Studies and quantitative - a questionnaire aimed at third year Bachelors students. Ultimately, this study provides answers to a knowledge gap, aiming to support fellow teachers to improve their way of interacting with students during the final stage of their Bachelors program.

Keywords

Thesis Supervision, Bachelor Program, Business and Economics, Higher Education.

JEL Classification

A22, I21, I23

References

Alam, F., Alam, Q., & Rasul, M. G. (2013). A pilot study on postgraduate supervision. Procedia Engineering, 56, 875–881.

Armstrong, S. J. (2004). The impact of supervisors’ cognitive styles on the quality of research supervision in management education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(4), 599–616.

Bailey, T. (2002). Postgraduate students’ experiences of postgraduate supervision. In Seminar on Postgraduate Supervision. University of Cape Town.

Deist, F. E. (1990). The role of the promoter. Theologia Evangelica, 23(3), 66–68.

de Kleijn, R. A. M., Mainhard, M. T., Meijer, P. C., Pilot, A., & Brekelmans, M. (2012). Master’s thesis supervision: Relations between perceptions of the supervisor–student relationship, final grade, perceived supervisor contribution to learning and student satisfaction. Studies in Higher Education, 37(8), 925–939.

Dillon, M. J., & Malott, R. W. (1981). Supervising master theses and doctoral dissertations. Teaching of Psychology, 8(4), 195–202.

Dysthe, O., Samara, A., & Westrheim, K. (2006). Multivoiced supervision of master’s students: A case study of alternative supervision practices in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 299–318.

Fraser, R., & Mathews, A. (1999). An evaluation of the desirable characteristics of a supervisor. Australian Universities’ Review, 42(1), 5–7.

Grant, B. (1999, July). Walking on a rackety bridge: Mapping supervision. In HERDSA Annual International Conference (pp. 12–15).

Grant, B. M. (2010). Improvising together: The play of dialogue in humanities supervision. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 9(3), 271–288.

Hemer, S. R. (2012). Informality, power and relationships in postgraduate supervision: Supervising PhD candidates over coffee. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(6), 827–839.

Hill, T., Acker, S., & Black, E. (1994). Research students and their supervisors in education and psychology. In Postgraduate education and training in the social sciences (pp. 53–72).

Hockey, J. (1994). Establishing boundaries: Problems and solutions in managing the PhD supervisor’s role. Cambridge Journal of Education, 24(2), 293–305.

Holzbaur, U. D. (2006). Project and thesis supervision: From leadership to examination: A German perspective. Journal for New Generation Sciences, 4(2), 1–21.

Knowles, S. (1999). Feedback on writing in postgraduate supervision: Echoes in response–context, continuity and resonance. In Supervision of postgraduate research in education (pp. 113–128).

Lessing, A. C., & Lessing, N. (2004). The supervision of research for dissertations and theses. Professional Accountant, 4(1), 73–87.

Lundgren, S. M., & Halvarsson, M. (2009). Students’ expectations, concerns and comprehensions when writing theses as part of their nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 29(5), 527–532.

McAlpine, L., & Weiss, J. (2000). Mostly true confessions: Joint meaning-making about the thesis journey. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 30(1), 1–26.

Mouton, J. (2001). How to succeed in your master’s and doctoral studies: A South African guide and resource book. Van Schaik.

Nerad, M., & Miller, D. S. (1997). The institution cares: Berkeley’s efforts to support dissertation writing in the humanities and social sciences. New Directions for Higher Education, 99, 75–90.

Neumann, R. (2003). The doctoral education experience: Diversity and complexity. http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/1088011

Pritchard, R. (2004). Humboldtian values in a changing world: Staff and students in German universities. Oxford Review of Education, 30(4), 509–528.

Schmolitzky, A., & Schümmer, T. (2008, July). Patterns for supervising thesis projects. In Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (EuroPLoP 2008).

Seagram, B., Gould, J., & Pyke, S. (1998). An investigation of gender and other variables on time to completion of doctoral degrees. Research in Higher Education, 39(3), 319–335.

Shim, S. H. (2008). A philosophical investigation of the role of teachers: A synthesis of Plato, Confucius, Buber, and Freire. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(3), 515–535.

Utriainen, K., Ahonen, S. M., Kangasniemi, M., & Liikanen, E. (2011). Health science students’ experiences of group supervision of the bachelor’s thesis. Journal of Nursing Education, 50(4), 205–210.

van Veen, K., Sleegers, P., Bergen, T., & Klaassen, C. (2001). Professional orientations of secondary school teachers towards their work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(2), 175–194.