Back to Volume
Peer Reviewed

Airports as tourism gateways: passenger perceptions and commercial revenue at Bucharest Henri Coandă International Airport

Type of paper: Research Article

Authors

Adrian Cioranu

Corresponding Author

Affiliation: Faculty of Business and Tourism, Bucharest University of Economic Studies

Email: acioranu@me.com

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0101-4610

Gabriela Ţigu

Affiliation: Faculty of Business and Tourism, Bucharest University of Economic Studies

Email: gabriela.tigu@ase.ro

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6189-8027

Received:March 19, 2026
Revised:April 22, 2026
Accepted:
Published:May 31, 2026

How to Cite

Cioranu, A. & Ţigu, G. (2026). Airports as tourism gateways: passenger perceptions and commercial revenue at Bucharest Henri Coandă International Airport. CACTUS - Journal of Tourism Business, Management and Economics, 8 (1), 73-82.

Based on the official APA guide. Review the full set of examples.

© 2026 The Author(s);

Licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Airports have evolved from simple transit points into complex tourism gateways that shape the travel experience and generate significant non-aeronautical revenues. This study provides an innovative perspective by highlighting how each airport’s unique operating context affects the strategies available to airport managers for increasing non-aeronautical revenues while enhancing passenger satisfaction. The paper presents an empirical, passenger-based analysis by examining how passenger perceptions of terminal commercial offerings, perceived dwell time, travel frequency, airline type, and demographic factors influence commercial spending behavior at Bucharest Henri Coandă International Airport (OTP). A structured questionnaire based on the ACI Airport Service Quality (ASQ) framework was administered to 315 passengers, and the data were analyzed using Spearman correlations, chi-square tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, binary logistic regression, and MANOVA. The results show that perceptions of commercial space attractiveness correlate positively with overall airport experience valuation (ρ = 0.247, p < 0.001), confirming the strategic importance of retail environments in airport tourism appeal. A counterintuitive finding indicates that passengers who perceive more available time after security are less likely to make purchases, suggesting that time pressure may trigger impulse buying at this airport. Travel frequency is the only globally significant predictor of post-security purchasing (p = 0.011), with occasional travelers showing a higher spending propensity than frequent flyers. Airline type (low-cost vs. full-service) has no statistically significant influence on purchasing behavior. The logistic regression model achieves an overall accuracy of 65.7%, demonstrating that perceptual and situational variables outweigh traditional traveler profile indicators in explaining airport consumer behavior. These findings have direct implications for airport managers, tourism planners, and commercial concessionaires seeking to optimize non-aeronautical revenue streams while enhancing the tourist passenger experience.

Keywords

Keywords were not provided for this article.

JEL Classification

No JEL classification codes were provided.

References

Airports Council International (ACI) World. (2023). Airport economics report.

Airports Council International. (2024). Airport service quality (ASQ) program. https://aci.aero/programs-and-services/asq/

Antwi, C. O., Ren, J., Zhang, W., Owusu-Ansah, W., Aboagye, M. O., Affum‐Osei, E. & Agyapong, R. A. (2022). “I am here to fly, but better get the environment right!” Communicative airport servicescape and the frequent flyer experience. Sustainability, 14(16), 10114. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610114

Air Transport Action Group (ATAG). (2019). Aviation benefits beyond borders.

Air Transport Action Group (ATAG). (2024). Aviation: Benefits beyond borders report.

Bakir, M., Akan, Ş., Özdemir, E., Nguyen, P.-H., Tsai, J.-F. & Pham, H.-A. (2022). How to Achieve Passenger Satisfaction in the Airport? Findings from Regression Analysis and Necessary Condition Analysis Approaches through Online Airport Reviews. Sustainability, 14(4), 2151. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042151

Bitner, M. J. (1992). Servicescapes: The impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees. Journal of Marketing, 56(2), 57-71. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252042

Bogicevic, V., Yang, W., Bilgihan, A., & Bujisic, M. (2013). Airport service quality drivers of passenger satisfaction. Tourism Review, 68(4), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-09-2013-0047

Chen, Y., Wu, C.-L., Lau, P. L., Yung, A. T. N., Ma, N. K. & Chung, Y. -S. (2019). Airport Passenger Shopping Modeling and Simulation: Targeting Distance Impacts. Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), 524-535, https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC40007.2019.9004776

Choi, S., Moon, C., Lee, K., Su, X., Hwang, J. & Kim, I. (2024). Exploring Smart Airports’ Information Service Technology for Sustainability: Integration of the Delphi and Kano Approaches. Sustainability, 16(20), 8958. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208958

Cioranu A., Mureşan, M. L., & Ţăranu, S.-D. (2025). Innovative strategies for optimizing airport revenue streams using AI. Romanian Economic and Business Review, 19(4), 29-42. https://rebe.rau.ro/REBE-WI24.pdf

Compania Națională Aeroporturi București. (2026). Bucharest Henri Coandă International Airport: Passenger information report 2024-2025. https://bucharestairports.ro/old/files/pages_files/BHCIA_WEBSITE
_2024_-_2025.pdf

Cristureanu, C., & Bobircă, A. (2007). Airports Driving Economic and Tourism Development. The Romanian Economic Journal, 10(25), 31-44. https://rejournal.eu/sites/rejournal.versatech.ro/files/articole/2014-04-18/2239/je202520cristureanu20bobirca.pdf

Fodness, D., & Murray, B. (2007). Passengers’ expectations of airport service quality. Journal of Services Marketing, 21(7), 492-506. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040710824852

Gibbons, S., Lyytikäinen, T., Overman, H., & Sanchis-Guarner, R. (2019). New road infrastructure: The effects on firms. Journal of Urban Economics, 110, 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2019.01.002

Gürler, H., & Erturgut, R. (2019). The effect of service quality on satisfaction levels of Generation X and Generation Y customers: A generation based research in the airline industry. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, 6(1), 135-153. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.441029

Huai, Y., Lee, E., Lo, H. K., & Zhang, A. (2025). Airport charge, terminal capacity, and suggested airport arrival time: Considering non-aeronautical business. Transportation Research Part B, 196, 103222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2025.103222

International Air Transport Association (IATA). (2024). Global outlook for air transport.

Li, H. (2023). Intergenerational difference in airport experience: The case of PHL International Airport (Master’s thesis, Temple University). https://scholarshare.temple.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/b8ba22d7-7158-47f5-a4df-1a0eb7706a54/content

Morlotti, C., Cattaneo, M., Malighetti, P., & Paleari, S. (2017). Multi-dimensional price elasticity for leisure and business destinations. Tourism Management, 61, 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.01.009

Nascimento, M. V., Borille, GM.R., Bandeira, M.C.G.S.P. & Silva, L.M. (2022). An evaluation of non-aviation revenues based on passenger satisfaction and quantity of commercial establishments at terminals: A case study of a Brazilian airport. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(2), 1457-1461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.05.011

Nicholls, R. (2010). New directions for customer-to-customer interaction research. Journal of Services Marketing, 24(1), 87-97. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876041011017916

O’Connell, J. F., & Williams, G. (2005). Passengers’ perceptions of low cost airlines and full service carriers: A case study. Journal of Air Transport Management, 11(4), 259-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.jairtraman.2005.01.007

Orhan, İ., & Orhan, G. (2020). Modelling and managing airport passenger flow: A case of Hasan Polatkan airport in Turkey. International Journal of Aviation Science and Technology, 1(2), 71-79. https://doi.org/10.23890/ijast.vm01is02.0204

Orsini, F., Gastaldi, M., Mantecchini, L., & Rossi, R. (2019). Neural networks trained with Wifi traces to predict airport passenger behavior. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1109/
MTITS.2019.8883365

Pant, P. (2022). Technology social practices by Millennials and Gen Z at airport departure terminals. Tourism Management Perspectives, 43, 100978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2022.100978

Richardson, C. T. (2012). A study of Generation X’s and Y’s perception of the customer experience when purchasing airline travel (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University).

Rosenbaum, M. S., & Massiah, C. (2011). An expanded servicescape perspective. Journal of Service Management, 22(4), 471-490. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231111155088

Silva, J., Kalakou S., & Andrade A. R. (2023). Maximizing non-aeronautical revenues in airport terminals using gate assignment and passenger behaviour modelling. Journal of Air Transport Management, 112, 102452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2023.102452

Ţigu, G., Cioranu, A., Miron, A., State, O., & Diaconescu, V. (2024). Airport Service Providers in Support of SDGs. Businesses, 4(3), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.3390/businesses4030023.

Tveter, E. (2017). The effect of airports on regional development: Evidence from the construction of regional airports in Norway. Research in Transportation Economics, 63, 50-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.retrec.2017.07.001

Zheng, M. C. (2014). How Airport Users luggage affects their Perception of Seat Design at Airports. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 13(1), 141-148. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.13.141