CACTUS CACTUS J Tour Bus Manag Econ CACTUS – Journal of Tourism Business, Management and Economics 2247-3297 ASE Publishing House Bucharest, Romania cactus-2020-9 Research Article A29, I21 Students’ Difficulties Into Understanding First-Year Subjects:  A Premise For University Drop-Out. Case Study: The Bucharest University Of Economic Studies, The Faculty Of Business And Tourism Iorgulescu Maria-Cristina https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4957-3590 cristina.iorgulescu@yahoo.com Holostencu Luciana-Floriana https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5671-0575 Iordache Mădălina-Ionela Țală Mădălina-Lavinia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0096-4195 Vălimăreanu (Mircioi) Ileana Bursuc Georgiana-Geanina Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania 15 12 2020 2 2 15122020 Copyright © 2020, The Author(s) 2020 The Author(s) This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

The increasing rate of students enrolling into higher education leads undoubtedly to a more contrasted student body, impeding the identification of potential sources that might determine their option into continuing or dropping out of university, mainly after the first year of admission. Although there are various reasons why students drop out of university, ranging from personal, social or even technical ones (considering online blended learning), we will focus mainly on difficulties encountered by students related to specific subjects or teaching techniques, known as academic difficulties. Therefore, considering Romania’s higher education is facing retention problems among students in various universities around the country, the purpose of the present study is to analyze the influence of a particular variable which, lato sensu, consists in students’ inability of channeling their resources into getting a deeper understanding of various university subjects in order to achieve effective learning and therefore successfully continue their studies. A quantitative study consisting in a two-stages questionnaire was carried out with 70 first year students enrolled at the Bucharest University of Economic Studies, the Faculty of Business and Tourism who agreed to take part into the development of their academic performance by joining the agenda provided via the Secondary Education Project – ROSE BT. The present research offers empirical evidence that might be useful for future decision-making in order to improve educational processes and both students’ and professors’ accomplishments in university settings. Also, the results have indicated that students who have difficulties into understanding first-year subjects are more open to engage into further communication and academic activities with their professors and also to adapt to improved teaching and interaction techniques or strategies.

 Keywords University drop-out education learning difficulties

Full text available in PDF format.

References Aina, C. (2013). Parental background and university dropout in Italy. Higher Education, 65(4), 437–456. Astin, A. W. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. College Student Development, 40(5), 518–529. https://www.middlesex.mass.edu/ace/downloads/astininv.pdf Bean, J., & Metzer, B. (1985). A conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate students’ attrition. Review of Educational Research, 55(4), 485–540. Bergeson, T. (2005). Promising programs and practices for dropout prevention. Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. Boylan, H. (2009). Targeted intervention for developmental education students (T.I.D.E.S.). Journal of Developmental Education, 32(3), 14–23. Brants, L., & Struyven, K. (2009). Literature review of online remedial education: A European perspective. Industry and Higher Education, 23(4), 269–275. Carr, S. (2000, February 11). As distance education comes to age, the challenge is keeping the students. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Casanova, J. R., Cervero, A., Núñez, J. C., Almeida, L. S., & Bernardo, A. (2018). Factors that determine the persistence and dropout of university students. Psicothema, 30(4), 408–414. Casanova, P., Cruz, M., de la Torre, M. J., & de la Villa, M. (2005). Influence of family and sociodemographic variables on students with low academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 25(4), 423–435. Chapman, C., Laird, J., & Kewal Ramani, A. (2010). Trends in high school dropout and completion rates in the United States: 1972–2008 (Compendium report). https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2011/2011012.pdf Dobransky, N. D., & Frymier, A. B. (2004). Developing teacher-student relationships through out-of-class communication. Communication Quarterly, 52(3), 211–223. Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (2006). Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge University Press. Faculty of Business and Tourism. (2019). Statistics on 2018–2019 university year [Unpublished statistics]. Bucharest University of Economic Studies. Ghignoni, E. (2015). Family background and university dropouts during the crisis: The case of Italy (Working Paper No. 169). Sapienza Università di Roma. Giles, I. M. (1999). An examination of persistence and dropout in the online computer-conferenced classroom [Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University]. Glaser, R. (1996). Changing the agency for learning: Acquiring expert performance. In The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 1–50). Erlbaum. Gury, N. (2011). Dropping out of higher education in France: A microeconomic approach using survival analysis. Education Economics, 19(1), 51–64. Hanushek, E. A. (2016). Will more higher education improve economic growth? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 32(4), 538–552. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/af6d/f747712c27f80f8105797c84cb67a4f54462.pdf Heublein, U. (2014). Student drop-out from German higher education institutions. European Journal of Education, 49(4), 497–513. Jones, A. C. (2008). The effects of out-of-class support on student satisfaction and motivation to learn. Communication Education, 57(3), 373–388. Jones, I., & White, S. (2000). Family composition, parent involvement, and young children’s academic achievement. Early Child Development and Care, 161, 71–82. Karna, S., & Julin, P. (2015). A framework for measuring student and staff satisfaction with university campus facilities. Quality Assurance in Education, 47–61. Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: Can one construct predict them all? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 148–161. Lobo, A. (2012). Will we meet again? Examining the reasons why students are leaving first year university courses and moving towards an approach to stop them. The International Journal of Learning, 18(7). McShane, K. (2004). Integrating face-to-face and online teaching: Academics’ role concept and teaching choices. Teaching in Higher Education, 9(1), 3–16. OECD. (2012). Equity and quality in education. https://www.oecd.org/education/school/50293148.pdf Pirmohamed, S., Debowska, A., & Boduszek, D. (2017). Gender differences in the correlates of academic achievement among university students. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 9(2), 313–324. Pricopie, R., Frunzaru, V., Corbu, N., Ivan, L., & Bârgăoanu, A. (2011). Acces și echitate în învățământul superior din România. http://www.invatamant-superior.ro/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Acces_si_echitate.pdf Qureshi, R., & Rarieya, J. (2008). Gendered education in Pakistan. Oxford University Press. Sandler, M. (2000). Career decision-making self-efficacy, perceived stress, and an integrated model of student persistence: A structural model of finances, attitudes, behavior, and career development. Research in Higher Education, 41(5), 537–580. Șimșek, H. (2013). University students’ tendencies toward and reasons behind dropout. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 6(2), 242–271. Stratton, L., O’Toole, D., & Wetzez, J. (2008). A multinomial logit model of college stop out and dropout behavior. Economics of Education Review, 27(3), 319–331. Thornberry, T. P., Moore, M., & Christenson, R. (1985). The effect of dropping out of high school on subsequent criminal behavior. Criminology, 23(1). Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/00346543045001089 10.3102/00346543045001089 Vries, W., León, P. A., Romero, J. M., & Hernández, I. H. (2011). Deserter or disappointed? Different causes for higher education dropout. Revista de la Educación Superior, 40(4), 29–49. Witt, P. L., Schrodt, P., & Turman, P. D. (2010). Connections conducive to classroom learning. In The SAGE handbook of communication and instruction (p. 201).