<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20221130//EN"
  "JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"
         xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.4"
         xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.4/xsd/JATS-archivearticle1-4-mathml3.xsd"
         xml:lang="en">

  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">CACTUS</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">CACTUS J Tour Bus Manag Econ</journal-id>

      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>CACTUS – Journal of Tourism Business, Management and Economics</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>

      <issn pub-type="epub">2247-3297</issn>

      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>ASE Publishing House</publisher-name>
        <publisher-loc>Bucharest, Romania</publisher-loc>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">cactus-2017-4</article-id>

      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="jel">
          <subject>J24, M14</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>

      <title-group>
        <article-title>The Corelation Between Team Cohesion and Team Performance in Tourism-Based Organisations</article-title>
      </title-group>

      <contrib-group>
        
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name>
            <surname>Misoc</surname>
            <given-names>Irina</given-names>
          </name>
          
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1_1"/>
          <email>irina_misoc@yahoo.com</email>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>

      
      <aff id="aff1_1">
        <label>1</label>
        <institution-wrap>
          <institution>Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania</institution>
        </institution-wrap>
      </aff>

      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>15</day>
        <month>6</month>
        <year>2017</year>
      </pub-date>

      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      
      

      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>15</day><month>6</month><year>2017</year></date>
        
        
      </history>

      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2017, The Author(s)</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
        <copyright-holder>The Author(s)</copyright-holder>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/">
          <license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).</license-p>
        </license>
        <ali:free_to_read/>
        <ali:license_ref>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
      </permissions>

      <abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This research focuses on the relationship between team cohesion and team performance in the tourism field.The literature review showed that researchers have found different results on the relationship between these two variables. The present case study was based on the hypothesis that, in the organizations that offer support to their employees, the teams with strong cohesion obtain better results compared with those with poor cohesion. The study was conducted in eight teams that share similar characteristic. The survey method was used for gathering data with two structured questionnaires: one questionnaire used for measuring the performance of the eight teams and another questionnaire used for measuring the team cohesion. The 5 point Likert scale was used to analyze both team performance and team cohesion. As a conclusion, the study revealed that the hypothesis is true, and the strong cohesive teams obtained higher scores in terms of performance, but the relationship between the two variables is more complex and should be studied in detail in future studies.</p></abstract>

      <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
        <title>Keywords</title>
        <kwd>team</kwd>
<kwd>team cohesion</kwd>
<kwd>team performance</kwd>
<kwd>team outcomes</kwd>
<kwd>team communication</kwd>
      </kwd-group>

      <self-uri content-type="text/html" xlink:href="http://0.0.0.0:3000/articles/cactus-issue-1-vol-XV-no-1-2017-art-4"/>
      <self-uri content-type="application/pdf" xlink:href="http://0.0.0.0:3000/Pdf/vol15/3.Misoc%20Irina.pdf"/>
      <self-uri content-type="application/xml" xlink:href="http://0.0.0.0:3000/api/articles/cactus-issue-1-vol-XV-no-1-2017-art-4/jats"/>

      <related-article ext-link-type="uri" related-article-type="in-issue" xlink:href="http://0.0.0.0:3000/issues/cactus-issue-1-vol-XV-no-1-2017" id="ra1"/>

    </article-meta>
  </front>

  <body>
    <p>Full text available in PDF format.</p>
  </body>

  <back>
    
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      
      <ref id="ref1">
        <element-citation publication-type="other">
          <comment>Andrews, M. C., Kacmar, K., Blakely, G. L., &amp;amp; Bucklew, N. S. (2008). Group cohesion as an enhancement to the justice–affective commitment relationship. Group &amp;amp; Organization Management, 33, 736–755.</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref2">
        <element-citation publication-type="other">
          <comment>Aslan, S., Ozata, M., &amp;amp; Mete, M. (2008). The investigation of effects of group emotional intelligence on team effectiveness. Humanity &amp;amp; Social Sciences Journal, 3(2), 104–115.</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref3">
        <element-citation publication-type="other">
          <comment>Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J., &amp;amp; McLendon, C. L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 989–1004.</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref4">
        <element-citation publication-type="other">
          <comment>Bourgault, M., &amp;amp; Drouin, N. (2008). How’s your distributed team doing? Ten suggestions from the field. Virtual Library.</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref5">
        <element-citation publication-type="other">
          <comment>Chiocchio, F., &amp;amp; Essiembre, H. (2009). Cohesion and performance: A meta-analytic review of disparities between project teams, production teams, and service teams. Small Group Research, 40(4), 382–420.</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref6">
        <element-citation publication-type="other">
          <comment>Dailey, R. C. (1991). Organizational behavior (pp. 15–21). Pitman Publishing.</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref7">
        <element-citation publication-type="other">
          <comment>Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129–152.</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref8">
        <element-citation publication-type="other">
          <comment>Duygulu, E., &amp;amp; Ciraklar, N. (2008). Team effectiveness and leadership roles. Munich Personal RePEc Archive.</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref9">
        <element-citation publication-type="other">
          <comment>Fine, A., &amp;amp; Holyfield, L. (1996). Secrecy, trust, and dangerous leisure: Generating group cohesion in voluntary organizations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 22–38.</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref10">
        <element-citation publication-type="other">
          <comment>Finnegan, R. (2002). Communicating: The multiple modes of human interconnection. Routledge.</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref11">
        <element-citation publication-type="other">
          <comment>Greene, C. N. (1989). Cohesion and productivity in work groups. Small Group Behavior, 20, 70–86.</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref12">
        <element-citation publication-type="other">
          <comment>Karakowsky, L., McBey, K., &amp;amp; Miller, D. (2004). Gender, perceived competence and power displays: Examining verbal interruptions in a group context. Small Group Research, 35(4), 407–439.</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref13">
        <element-citation publication-type="other">
          <comment>Landers, D. M., Wilkinson, M. O., Hatfield, B. D., &amp;amp; Barber, H. (1982). Causality and the cohesion–performance relationship. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 170–183.</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref14">
        <element-citation publication-type="other">
          <comment>Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., &amp;amp; MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents and consequences. Sage.</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref15">
        <element-citation publication-type="other">
          <comment>Pinto, J. K. (2007). Project management: Achieving competitive advantage. Pearson Education.</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref16">
        <element-citation publication-type="other">
          <comment>Solansky, S. (2011). Team identification: A determining factor of performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26(3), 247–258.</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref17">
        <element-citation publication-type="other">
          <comment>Taylor, D. M., Doria, J., &amp;amp; Tyler, J. K. (1983). Group performance and cohesiveness: An attribution analysis. Journal of Social Psychology, 119, 187–198.</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref18">
        <element-citation publication-type="other">
          <comment>Van Woerkom, M., &amp;amp; Sanders, K. (2010). The romance of learning from disagreement: The effect of cohesiveness and disagreement on knowledge sharing behavior and individual performance within teams. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(1), 139–149.</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref19">
        <element-citation publication-type="other">
          <comment>Webber, S. S., &amp;amp; Donahue, L. M. (2001). Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 27(2), 141.</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref20">
        <element-citation publication-type="other">
          <comment>Williams, J. M., &amp;amp; Hacker, C. M. (1982). Causal relationships among cohesion, satisfaction, and performance in women’s intercollegiate field hockey teams. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 324–337.</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>

</article>